X-Git-Url: https://git.stg.codes/stg.git/blobdiff_plain/bfec9cc7ab5a396f7662090b208691ec59a69f1b..2f1753cc3e240fa497a87873ed19fe3f11e22331:/doc/xslt/params/footnote.number.symbols.xml

diff --git a/doc/xslt/params/footnote.number.symbols.xml b/doc/xslt/params/footnote.number.symbols.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..10ca7d3c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/xslt/params/footnote.number.symbols.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+<refentry xmlns="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook"
+          xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
+          xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude"
+          xmlns:src="http://nwalsh.com/xmlns/litprog/fragment"
+          xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"
+          version="5.0" xml:id="footnote.number.symbols">
+<refmeta>
+<refentrytitle>footnote.number.symbols</refentrytitle>
+<refmiscinfo class="other" otherclass="datatype"/>
+</refmeta>
+<refnamediv>
+<refname>footnote.number.symbols</refname>
+<refpurpose>Special characters to use as footnote markers</refpurpose>
+</refnamediv>
+
+<refsynopsisdiv>
+<src:fragment xml:id="footnote.number.symbols.frag">
+<xsl:param name="footnote.number.symbols"></xsl:param>
+</src:fragment>
+</refsynopsisdiv>
+
+<refsection><info><title>Description</title></info>
+
+<para>If <parameter>footnote.number.symbols</parameter> is not the empty string,
+footnotes will use the characters it contains as footnote symbols. For example,
+<quote>*&amp;#x2020;&amp;#x2021;&amp;#x25CA;&amp;#x2720;</quote> will identify
+footnotes with <quote>*</quote>, <quote>†</quote>, <quote>‡</quote>,
+<quote>◊</quote>, and <quote>✠</quote>. If there are more footnotes
+than symbols, the stylesheets will fall back to numbered footnotes using
+<parameter>footnote.number.format</parameter>.</para>
+
+<para>The use of symbols for footnotes depends on the ability of your
+processor (or browser) to render the symbols you select. Not all systems are
+capable of displaying the full range of Unicode characters. If the quoted characters
+in the preceding paragraph are not displayed properly, that's a good indicator
+that you may have trouble using those symbols for footnotes.</para>
+
+</refsection>
+</refentry>